On 6/26/2014 11:20 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:

On Jun 26, 2014, at 9:13 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:

...

On Jun 27, 2014, at 00:07 , Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:

...

http://joshuapundit.blogspot.com/2014/06/court-ruling-israeli-and-us-terrori...

Have not seen much discussion about this.

...

That would be a horrifically bad precedent to set. I hope this insanity stops before it get started.

Anyone have a link to the actual ruling? This URL is to a very positionally-specific interpretation of events, which is fairly disconnected from reality on the ICANN side… It’s quite possible it’s an equally clueless interpretation of the court decision. In any event, even if the court was as clueless as this implies, it won’t go anywhere.

http://richardedmondson.net/2014/06/25/us-court-ruling-theoretically-could-m... quotes other articles--non seem to be the ruling per se. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)