Re: Name Server Change-over completed
I guess the moon is in phase with some star somewhere, and now it's time to argue who's root is he "real" root... Barf. Enough already - we all have our own roots. one guy follows Vixies roots, while I typically roll my own. Many others do other things.
The final point of this insanity is that there is NOT a single root. Hasn't been for a hell of a long time, and I suspect that there never will be again.
I have never seen any alternative root that got more than a few percent visibility penetration, other than Kashpureff's "Go Directly To Jail, Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200" trick. While some of you may consider it a victory if you and your two friends can see your private TLDs, the inability of the vast bulk of internet users to resolve your TLDs seems to argue that they're not particularly useful. If your customers can't advertise it to Worldcom and AOL and Mindspring and Earthlink customers (as a representative example set), and you intend to be general purpose, and as far as I can tell none of the alternatives have ever been able to, then you're masturbating rather than crafting serious net policy. This mailing list does not exist to discuss experiments in alternative DNS, if you have not figured out how to surmount the combined political and technical barriers required for general purpose use of those alternative TLDs. -george william herbert gherbert@retro.com
:I guess the moon is in phase with some star somewhere, and now it's time to :argue who's root is he "real" root... Barf. Enough already - we all have :our own roots. one guy follows Vixies roots, while I typically roll my :own. Many others do other things. The moon was full last tuesday - I'm normally prepared for the kooks that come out of the woodwork on such days, but you've successfully foiled me on that end with your delay. :The final point of this insanity is that there is NOT a single root. Hasn't :been for a hell of a long time, and I suspect that there never will be :again. By definition, there can be only one root, dns or otherwise. Of course, there are alternate "roots" to which folks like yourself subscribe - have fun. The inherent/obvious problem is that only folks as misguided as yourself will (ahem) benefit from the use of your "root" zone. That rather limits the reachability of sites subscribing to your ideals, no? As somebody who's fairly well-versed wrt dns asked earlier, "got an rfc#"? :> > Its no joke. :> :> The only joke here is your lack of knowledge concerning basic networking :> concepts like DNS. : :I sayth to you, the parties in interest: Deal with it. It aint gonna :change. Everybody's dealing. Kudos for the comic relief. :The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, :associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of :those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the :first place... :-------------------------------------------------------------------- Wow - someone employs you? Say "Hi" to Jim Fleming for me. Apologies to all for the troll reply. cheers, brian
participants (2)
-
Brian Wallingford
-
George William Herbert