Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing
: Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him... Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak. scott --- ronald.dasilva@twcable.com wrote: From: Ron da Silva <ronald.dasilva@twcable.com> To: <nanog@merit.edu> Subject: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 09:21:17 -0400 Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...can anyone else here provide some insight into the reachability testing provided for this allocation given to Randy from ARIN? Thanks, -ron ------ Forwarded Message From: "da Silva, Ronald" <ronald.dasilva@twcable.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:14:52 -0400 To: <randy@psg.com> Conversation: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Subject: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing Randy - I see...96.0.0.0/16 flagged for reachability testing, but we have allocations from 98.0.0.0/8 and seem to be educating folks like <omitted> and others to drop stale bogon filters...you see any issues with the 96/16 block? If not, it might be a false positive for the rest of the /6...perhaps folk were applying policies based on /8's instead of the /6... Thanks! -ron ------ End of Forwarded Message ----------------------------------------- This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
: Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...
Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak.
Both practices arguably ingenious or idiotic...
Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...can anyone else here provide some insight into the reachability testing provided for this allocation given to Randy from ARIN?
I am more interested in the above though than why Randy isn't reading my email. -ron ----------------------------------------- This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 14:08, Ron da Silva wrote:
On 5/1/07 7:19 PM, "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
: Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...
Probably because you have a 12+ line .sig full of lawyer-speak.
Both practices arguably ingenious or idiotic...
Randy's MUA automatically deletes email sent directly to him...can anyone else here provide some insight into the reachability testing provided for this allocation given to Randy from ARIN?
I am more interested in the above though than why Randy isn't reading my email.
If you're not getting any bounces and tracesroutes to the recipiant mailserver don't display any problems and the other mailserver seems to accept it (i.e. it's a not-dead domain), I'd wager it'd be a spam filter gone off the wall and is dropping your email; after all, nowadays spam filters ARE getting vicious and often even times legit mail gets bit-bucketted and/or marked as spam.
-ron
----------------------------------------- This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
I see not a lot has changed on egg^H^H^Hnanog. I'll forward to noc@arin.net to see where that goes (only useful reply). Thanks for the entertainment! :-) -ron ----------------------------------------- This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
participants (3)
-
Kradorex Xeron -
Ron da Silva -
Scott Weeks