Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints. going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps old news. Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt? Darn it Thanks in advance
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:43:47 -0400 "Joe Blanchard" <jbfixurpc@gmail.com> wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
Should your users perhaps be going to whitehouse.gov? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Joe Blanchard wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
There's something wrong with this reality. Maybe we can redirect that too. Domain Name:WHITEHOUSE.ORG Created On:05-Sep-1995 04:00:00 UTC Last Updated On:23-Jan-2006 19:17:13 UTC Expiration Date:04-Sep-2015 04:00:00 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions LLC (R63-LROR) Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Registrant ID:23421300-NSI Registrant Name:Satire On-line Registrant Organization:Satire On-line Registrant Street1:245-M Mount Hermon Road, Suite 137 Registrant Street2: Registrant Street3: Registrant City:Scotts Valley Registrant State/Province:CA Registrant Postal Code:95066 Registrant Country:US Registrant Phone:+1.6502123765 Registrant Phone Ext.: Registrant FAX:+1.9999999999 Registrant FAX Ext.: Registrant Email:pace@ILLUMINATI.ORG Something tells me, this isn't the whitehouse your customers were looking for. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Joe Blanchard wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps old news.
whitehouse.gov does not equal whitehouse.org . And some of us who have been around for a while can attest with some certainty that whitehouse.gov DEFINITELY doesn't equal whitehouse.com . :-) -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jay Hennigan wrote:
And some of us who have been around for a while can attest with some certainty that whitehouse.gov DEFINITELY doesn't equal whitehouse.com . :-)
Oh I don't know...what about during the Clinton years? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
whitehouse.org has had the same A record for quite some time, sharing the ip with a bunch of other .. interesting .. sites. It's been at 67.19.217.250 for years now. If your info matches that, there's no DNS issues to worry about. -j On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Joe Blanchard <jbfixurpc@gmail.com> wrote:
Not that I care one way or another, but since I've gotten 20+ complaints.
going to www.whitehouse.org yields something else. I know I know, perhaps old news.
Should I just redirect or is our DNS corrupt?
Darn it
Thanks in advance
-- Jamie Rishaw // .com.arpa@j <- reverse it. ish. [Impressive C-level Title Here], arpa / arpa labs
participants (5)
-
jamie rishaw -
Jay Hennigan -
Joe Blanchard -
Jon Lewis -
Steven M. Bellovin