The NASA.COM debate is really more of a domain name issue and something that supposedly NANOG members are not concerned about. I would think that the NANOG members would be more concerned about organizations that use one of the legacy Root Name Servers to support their SLD(s). Some day maybe the legacy Root Name Servers will conform to RFC 2010. That is an operational issue that I would assume that some NANOG members would address. Jim Fleming ================================================ National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA-DOM) NASA Ames Research Center Mail Stop 233-8 Moffett Field, CA 94035 Domain Name: NASA.GOV Administrative Contact: Paschall, Beth (BP1760) Beth.Paschall@MSFC.NASA.GOV (205) 544-2930 (FAX) (205) 544-2554 Technical Contact, Zone Contact: Mughal, Asim (AM3388) asim@NSIPO.NASA.GOV (415) 604-5705 (FAX) (415) 604-0063 Record last updated on 27-Jun-97. Record created on 07-Jan-86. Database last updated on 12-Jul-97 04:23:14 EDT. Domain servers in listed order: E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET 192.203.230.10 JPL-MIL.JPL.NASA.GOV 128.149.1.101 NS.GSFC.NASA.GOV 128.183.10.134 MX.NSI.NASA.GOV 128.102.18.31 =================================================
On Sat, Jul 12, 1997 at 03:01:33PM -0500, Jim Fleming wrote:
The NASA.COM debate is really more of a domain name issue and something that supposedly NANOG members are not concerned about.
Inasmuch as I got nattered about on this topic this week, and the charter and AUP do _not_ seem to enumerate what is on-topic for this list, contrary to what I was told, could someone supply a pointer to, or a list of, types of topics that actually _are_ on topic for this mailing list? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra@baylink.com Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "People propose, science studies, technology Tampa Bay, Florida conforms." -- Dr. Don Norman +1 813 790 7592
participants (2)
-
Jay R. Ashworth
-
Jim Fleming