RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
Hi Randy,
I might be wrong, but I thought an image with IPv6 support required 16 MB flash on the 2500?
could be. don't care. don't need ipv6 on terminal servers for oob access.
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml Why don't you care? Chris
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml
the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a bit wider than v6. the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation. randy
The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained instances where folks were being insulting and crude. Tim Rainier Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sent by: owner-nanog@merit.edu 08/02/2005 03:39 PM To "Chris Ranch" <CRanch@Affinity.com> cc Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no>, "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>, <nanog@merit.edu> Subject RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050729-ipv6.shtml
the general problem is definitely wider than the v6 hole. i believe, but of course could be wrong, that the april fix was a bit wider than v6. the blackhat/nanog problem is that, if we are not allowed to discuss these things openly, all is conjecturbation. randy
The "nanog problem" was clearly stated. It had nothing to do with the specific discussion, but more that the discussion contained instances where folks were being insulting and crude.
then address the insults and crudeness. randy
participants (3)
-
Chris Ranch -
Randy Bush -
trainier＠kalsec.com