I am seeing all IPv6 prefixes that are monitored by Sixxs as being down and unavailable. Anyone know why? Thanks, Hank
On 2012-06-20 01:04, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I am seeing all IPv6 prefixes that are monitored by Sixxs as being down and unavailable.
Hmmm, I didn't see this on info@sixxs.net which would be the usual place to report any issues with respect to SixXS, but there the same reply would be given: which monitoring of which prefixes? I can only assume you mean the GRH portion of SixXS: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/ But there most of it looks fine (ignoring the broken peering sessions) thus I can only wonder what the issue might be. But maybe I am missing something obvious ;) If you do see something that looks out of the ordinary, don't hesitate to report it to info@sixxs.net as quite clearly stated on the contact page and apparently needs repeating on the NANOG list... Greets, Jeroen
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Jeroen Massar wrote: Ill report it to them but: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/ Shows every country as V=0 (prefixes visible per country). -Hank
On 2012-06-20 01:04, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I am seeing all IPv6 prefixes that are monitored by Sixxs as being down and unavailable.
Hmmm, I didn't see this on info@sixxs.net which would be the usual place to report any issues with respect to SixXS, but there the same reply would be given: which monitoring of which prefixes?
I can only assume you mean the GRH portion of SixXS: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/
But there most of it looks fine (ignoring the broken peering sessions) thus I can only wonder what the issue might be. But maybe I am missing something obvious ;)
If you do see something that looks out of the ordinary, don't hesitate to report it to info@sixxs.net as quite clearly stated on the contact page and apparently needs repeating on the NANOG list...
Greets, Jeroen
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote: It would appear that whatever was broken is now fixed. -Hank
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Ill report it to them but: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/ Shows every country as V=0 (prefixes visible per country).
-Hank
On 2012-06-20 01:04, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
I am seeing all IPv6 prefixes that are monitored by Sixxs as being down and unavailable.
Hmmm, I didn't see this on info@sixxs.net which would be the usual place to report any issues with respect to SixXS, but there the same reply would be given: which monitoring of which prefixes?
I can only assume you mean the GRH portion of SixXS: http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/
But there most of it looks fine (ignoring the broken peering sessions) thus I can only wonder what the issue might be. But maybe I am missing something obvious ;)
If you do see something that looks out of the ordinary, don't hesitate to report it to info@sixxs.net as quite clearly stated on the contact page and apparently needs repeating on the NANOG list...
Greets, Jeroen
Good morning (at least on this side of the planet), On 2012-06-20 02:14, Hank Nussbacher wrote:> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Ill report it to them but:
NANOG is afaik still not the "contact the people who run things" email address... Nevertheless, if issues, do not hesitate to report to info@sixxs.net
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/ Shows every country as V=0 (prefixes visible per country).
That would mean that every prefix was not updated in the last day, sounds odd to me. On 2012-06-20 04:00, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
It would appear that whatever was broken is now fixed.
The only thing I can think of is that you have noticed some weird glitch of the kind there. As mentioned above the "Visible" is basically the amount of prefixes visible in the last 24 hours. For that to become 0 it would have meant that no prefix would have been seen for the last 24 hours. According to http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/ which just telnets into grh.sixxs.net and asks for quagga's status, seems that even peering sessions are connected for longer than that, thus I am puzzled to what could have caused that then. Greets, Jeroen
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2012-1820 possibly related? On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
Good morning (at least on this side of the planet),
On 2012-06-20 02:14, Hank Nussbacher wrote:> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Ill report it to them but:
NANOG is afaik still not the "contact the people who run things" email address...
Nevertheless, if issues, do not hesitate to report to info@sixxs.net
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/tla/ Shows every country as V=0 (prefixes visible per country).
That would mean that every prefix was not updated in the last day, sounds odd to me.
On 2012-06-20 04:00, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
It would appear that whatever was broken is now fixed.
The only thing I can think of is that you have noticed some weird glitch of the kind there.
As mentioned above the "Visible" is basically the amount of prefixes visible in the last 24 hours. For that to become 0 it would have meant that no prefix would have been seen for the last 24 hours.
According to http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/status/ which just telnets into grh.sixxs.net and asks for quagga's status, seems that even peering sessions are connected for longer than that, thus I am puzzled to what could have caused that then.
Greets, Jeroen
-- Kyle Creyts Information Assurance Professional BSidesDetroit Organizer
participants (3)
-
Hank Nussbacher -
Jeroen Massar -
Kyle Creyts