| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX. If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions. I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means. Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something? Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Sean M. Doran wrote:
| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions.
PX = Private eXchange (private peering). sorry 'bout any confusion.
I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means.
Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
I believe he meant private interconnect. As you know, Sprint's contracts strictly forbid discussing interconnection points in any detail by either party.
| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions.
I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means.
Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
And Sprint owns earthlink does it not? As I look at this more and more I see the internet and the web being destroyed and cut up and soon non functional for anyone's use. The government must be laughing their asses off and wallstreet is gonna have a field day with toasted ISP's and carriers destroyed by blind people's greed and inability to manage a global network Failure of management is the crux to this issue and maintaining what has worked for over 20 years. That to states there are some people in serious need of sacking in some boardrooms..... Henry R. Linneweh Sean M. Doran wrote:
| I checked before doing so, and I checked once again in light of your | allegation. And, according to Exodus, this *IS* a PX.
If by PX you mean "public exchange point", then Sprint is being unusually inconsistent with its naming, numbering, and topology conventions.
I'm curious as to which exchange point it is, if that in fact is what PX means.
Of course, whatever type of connection it is, I'm curious about the fact that packets are always drawn towards this one connection. Are there others? If so, are they down or something?
Sean. (wondering why Sprint would give away a single free T3)
-- ¢4i1å
On Thu, Aug 13, 1998 at 02:39:34PM -0700, Henry Linneweh wrote:
And Sprint owns earthlink does it not? As I look at this more and more I
As I understand it, Sprint is outsourcing end-user dialups to Earthlink and Earthlink remains an independent. -- Steve Sobol, Cartel Member #1489 (tinc) Quote of the year: "If Bill [Gates] were tan, buffed and weighed 240 pounds, I bet people would dig IS." - Michael Cohn, COMPUTERWORLD Magazine, 8/3/98.
participants (5)
-
Adam Rothschild -
Henry Linneweh -
Robert Bowman -
Sean M. Doran -
Steven J. Sobol