Dear all, you might still remember draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming [1] being announced on this list [2]. After an extensive period of gathering feedback and both a change in name and IETF Working Group, I am pleased to announce the new draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming [3]. Taking the broad consensus into account, we are reasonably expecting hextet to come out as the only option. The only remaining questions are: 1) MAY 'quibble' be allowed as an optional name? I think not, but we were not 100% in agreement and thus decided to pop the question to the IETF and operator communities at large. 2) MUST or SHOULD 'hextet" be used in all written documentation? 3) Is this a Proposed Standard or already a Best Current Practice, given that a lot of people swtiched, already? I am looking forward to any and all feedback, either on this or the 6man list [4]. Thanks, Richard [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-denog-v6ops-addresspartnaming [2] http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2010-November/027920.html [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hartmann-6man-addresspartnaming [4] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg13805.html