there are two replies here. --- Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> writes:

..., what's the harm in dhcpv6? (different strokes and all that)

only the egos and reputations of those who said that stateless autoconf was all ipv6 needed. (which is a small price to pay, according to me.) --- "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins@arbor.net> writes:

On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:

...

Also don't forget privacy-enhanced addresses.

Yes, which have extremely negative opsec connotations in terms of complicating traceback.

/64 csma subnets with low order 64 bits controlled by infectable pc's means we'll be blackholing by /64 when we blackhole in ipv6. it's no big deal. -- Paul Vixie KI6YSY