Re: Ungodly packet loss rates
Bill Manning wrote: In fact... :) To borrow from your FedEx model.. We can build bigger doors (MTU) but the conveyer belts are stuck at 100Mm/sec. We need faster conveyer belts! (waiting for HPPI-64 or G-Ether technologies w/ baited breath :) And then watch out 2-4Gbps backplanes... (that is aggregate right?) Oh, well. You do not need 2 or whatever Gbps backplanes to build terabit per second networks. --vadim
Bill Manning wrote:
In fact... :)
To borrow from your FedEx model.. We can build bigger doors (MTU) but the conveyer belts are stuck at 100Mm/sec. We need faster conveyer belts! (waiting for HPPI-64 or G-Ether technologies w/ baited breath :) And then watch out 2-4Gbps backplanes... (that is aggregate right?)
Oh, well.
You do not need 2 or whatever Gbps backplanes to build terabit per second networks.
--vadim
Correct. I've got a terabit network on my desk right now. Its kind of simple and doesn't scale well... only two ports. But what can you expect from strands of fiber... :) --bill
participants (2)
-
bmanning@ISI.EDU
-
Vadim Antonov