On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry@jtcloe.net> wrote:
There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it.
--- cb.list6@gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> My understanding is that is not currently commonly the case https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-Mo... --------------------------------------------------- Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space? Or are they just not continuing to expand into it? scott
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <jerry@jtcloe.net> wrote:
There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to customers and nat's it.
--- cb.list6@gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
My understanding is that is not currently commonly the case
https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-Mo... ---------------------------------------------------
Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space? Or are they just not continuing to expand into it?
scott
They stopped using ipv4 assigned for handsets for most cases with 464xlat https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/case-study-t-mobile... BT did similar https://www.ipv6.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Nick-Heatley_BT_EE_Update... And Telstra https://blog.apnic.net/2017/01/13/telstras-five-year-mobile-ipv6-plan-become... And SK https://blog.apnic.net/2019/06/03/ipv6-deployment-and-challenges-at-sk-telec... And Rogers, Telus, and others
participants (2)
-
Ca By -
Scott Weeks