RE: Global Crossing Network Problem.
Obviously the "other" means of protection doesn't work too well...
-----Original Message----- From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jesper@skriver.dk] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 2:33 PM To: Mohamed Hirse Cc: Steve Nash; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Global Crossing Network Problem.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:16:34PM -0400, Mohamed Hirse wrote:
Thanks Steve. I would hope GBLX has some sort of SONET protection deployed accross their network.
Why - if they have other means of protection, it can be just as good.
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:08:58PM -0700, Mike Bostardi wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jesper Skriver [mailto:jesper@skriver.dk] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 2:33 PM To: Mohamed Hirse Cc: Steve Nash; nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Global Crossing Network Problem.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 05:16:34PM -0400, Mohamed Hirse wrote:
Thanks Steve. I would hope GBLX has some sort of SONET protection deployed accross their network.
Why - if they have other means of protection, it can be just as good.
Obviously the "other" means of protection doesn't work too well...
In this case, it looks like it didn't - that is if they had/have other means of protection. But I can say for the network I know best, it works just fine. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
participants (2)
-
Jesper Skriver -
Mike Bostardi