On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:17 AM Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.com> wrote:
On 24/Aug/20 17:21, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
You probably mean 464XLAT ....
Ask you vendors. They should support it. Ask for RFC8585 support, even better.
If they don't do, is because they are interested only in selling new boxes ... just something to think in the future about those vendors.
I can tell you that many vendors now support or are waiting for some customers to ask for it, the CLAT. I've been doing this for many customers. Sometimes, they only do under request, same as many other firmware features.
If CLAT support were wide-spread, it would quickly accelerate the
deployment of IPv6 in broadband applications.
Not even Mikrotik are doing it, and they pretty much own the FTTH CPE
market in many countries.
If only CPE's could run Android, or Windows :-).
Mark.
Askey ships 464xlat boxes for T-Mobile in the USA, so they have the products and the knowledge to make it work https://www.askey.com.tw/index.html I am aware of other big CPE makers too, but this is the public one providing product today. Also, anything based on OpenWRT works... which is increasingly the base vendors build on.