24 Jan
2010
24 Jan
'10
12:20 a.m.
On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by "tech" reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll assume they broke the law.
No. I write there's incomplete information, mention what possibly happened, what alternatives exist, and ask for more data. Yes, if Google did do it, I support the move. Do you have new information to kill speculation, or should these "tech" reporters keep at it? Gadi.