-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 7:06 PM To: Paul Vixie Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:32:33PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: What i've done is rate-limit TCP inbound to be around 75-80% of the link speed to force things to back-off and leave space for my UDP packet streams.
I think one of the major problems is that very few people know how to, or are capable of sending larger g711 frames (at increased delay, but more data per packet) because they can't set these more granular settings on their systems.. this means you have a lot higher pps rates which I think is the problem with the radio gear, it's just not designed for high pps rates..
That's interesting. . . where's the intersection of the packet size curve and the latency curve? I mean, where would you set it, and can you offset some of that with fragmentation and intervleaving? I'm outside of that "very few people," but I could imagine wanting dynamic control--one packet size (latency) for a certain calling plan (calls within the LAN, maybe even to anywhere on my network if I control end-to-end QoS, and local calls) but another for long distance.
- jared
Lee