24 Jun
2004
24 Jun
'04
9:10 p.m.
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:16:49 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
I suspect that the spammer can find a lawyer who is willing to argue the idea that the "safety and security" of the AS701 backbone was not prejudiced by the spammer's actions,
OK, let them sue. If you are against spam, you have to stand up in court and say so. Anyway all the spamming is now in violation of contracts. These people would come to court with 'dirty hands' in the term of art, and the court would not look favorably on any case they might try to make Jeffrey Race