1 Dec
1995
1 Dec
'95
11:10 p.m.
Jim,
I made a private reply to Curtis on his posting earlier this week, and he gave a nice analysis and cc'd end2end-interest rather than nanog. For those that don't care to care to read all this, here's the summary:
[ .. summary deleted .. ] I did mention that I didn't mind you forwarding that note. There was subsequent discussion on the end2end-interest list. I may be overstating the buffering requirements since the assumption is made that a high degree of synchronization could occur. This really needs to be backed up by simulations. Curtis