On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Doesn't this in theory mean any isp who hands you any pipe that you can slap a linksys VPN router on is also liable? Where does it begin? When it's the ISP who provides the router? What about colo? Isn't a dedicated box (with KAME/Ipsec/OpenVPN/etc) enough to do that? What about companies who provide ipv6 connectivity over ipv4? Or is this going to get to the point where there's going to be a requirement for protocol detection and ISPs will have to perform due diligence and scan/block -- or pony up? -Dan
http://cwidc.com/JP/EN/news_events/media_center/2004/02_04_2004_16.html
Says they're offering managed IP-VPN QoS besides other stuff like data center hosting, ATM, frame relay etc.. I'm sure they're going to be really happy with the proposed "tax" on managed VPN providers in India.
srs
-- "Hey Guys, does anyone know what 'poon tang' is?" -C.S. Dave, July 8, 2K, about 12:30AM --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------