And just imagine what email threading might be like today ... ... if early email clients had defaulted to displaying the *bottom* of the thread (as if you'd scrolled there). Thoughtful UX design matters. -- Royce Williams Tech Solvency On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 8:39 PM <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
And now you're sitting here wondering what possible relevance that might have to some line or other - the only context you have at this point is that it's a reply to something you wrote. Actually, at this point you don't even have that.
So you may have read this entire thing and now you're still wondering what possible relevance it may have to the thread.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 00:24:30 -0500, bzs@theworld.com said:
Why dig through what you've already read to see the new comments?
Or you can put the comment after, so everybody who reads text top to bottom has the context. I'm not away of any languages or writing systems that work from bottom to top, so that's pretty much everybody. And if people trimmed the quoted material so only the parts being replied to are left, there's not much digging involved.