RD> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:44:07 -0400 (EDT) RD> From: Ralph Doncaster RD> Router A and B are connected via a common ethernet segment 1. RD> Router A uses 10.10.10.1/30, and Router B uses 10.10.10.2/30. RD> Router B also has another subnet configured for ethernet RD> segment 1; 172.16.16.0/24. RD> RD> When I setup a situation like the above, with Router B RD> advertising the 172.16.16.0/24 to router A, router A sees a RD> next hop of 10.10.10.2. This is not good since packets from RD> A going to the 172.16.16 subnet get sent to Router B, which RD> then ARPs the desitnation, instead of just being ARPed by RD> router A. Is this what you're trying to do: route-map <foo> match <whatever> set ip next-hop <something> ? Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.