Re: 214/8 and 215/8

Philip Smith wrote (on Nov 01):

I seem to remember that they were exchanged for 49/8 and 50/8. Seems a bit odd that this was done, and I'd love to know what the technical or operational or political advantage was. Maybe the IANA folks can shed more light?

OT: Perhaps the military hasn't come across the "ip classless" (or equivalent for other antiquated vendors) directive? Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net T: +44 845 333 0122 == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC F: +44 845 333 0122