Agreed. There now. We need cheap, open source, options for widespread adoption. Oliver On Dec 20, 2017 12:51, "Michael Crapse" <michael@wi-fiber.io> wrote:
+1 for Nat64. dual stack is just keeping ipv4 around longer than it needs to be
On 19 December 2017 at 18:50, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> wrote:
On Dec 19, 2017, at 07:39 , Livingood, Jason < Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
On 12/18/17, 2:36 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Harald Koch" < nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of chk@pobox.com> wrote:
They could use IPv6. I mean, if the mobile phone companies can figure it out, surely an ISP can...
Except for cases when it is impossible or impractical to update
software
on a great number of legacy devices…
JL
Yeah, in those cases, they should use IPv6 + NAT64 or similar mechanism.
Owen