While we will get us there eventually it will be at the considerably more expensive for everyone involved. There is also a distinct lack of a working free market in most of the world. There isn't one in Australia. From what I read there isn't one in most of the developed nations in the world including the US. Mark On 17/12/2015, at 11:14 AM, Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote:
Mark,
Why? Why do WE "need" to force people to bend to our will? The market will get us all there eventually.
I don't like what you eat. Lets put a surcharge on it to make you feel pain and do what I want. :)
-mel beckman
On Dec 16, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
This doesn't put pain on those that have enough addresses that they don't need to NAT yet. We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
Mark
On 17/12/2015, at 10:39 AM, Charles Monson <charles.lists@camonson.com> wrote:
We need to make IPv4 painful to use. Adding delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would be one way to achieve this. Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.
It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to use.