25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
11:34 p.m.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com> wrote:
I suggested that probably 99% of the false positives I see could be avoided by just waiting until there are two or more complaints from the same source before firing it back as spam.
And the trouble is - that can and will be gamed by "horizontally scaling" spammers. Misreports of the sort you describe shouldnt trigger blocks anyway.