In MPLS network when we speak of utilization is 50% between 2 points in a circuit , What does it mean and how can I measure it ? Sent from my BlackBerry® via Smartfren EVDO Network -----Original Message----- From: nanog-request@nanog.org Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:11:21 To: <nanog@nanog.org> Reply-To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 63, Issue 29 Send NANOG mailing list submissions to nanog@nanog.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to nanog-request@nanog.org You can reach the person managing the list at nanog-owner@nanog.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: 30% packet loss between cox.net and hetzner.de, possibly at tinet.net (Denys Fedoryshchenko) 2. Verizon DSL moving to CGN (cb.list6) 3. Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN (Joshua Smith) 4. Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN (Oliver Garraux) 5. Re: ICMP Redirect on Resolvers (Jimmy Hess) 6. Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN (Derek Ivey) 7. Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN (Constantine A. Murenin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 03:09:00 +0300 From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb> To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: 30% packet loss between cox.net and hetzner.de, possibly at tinet.net Message-ID: <d453f32ec9779702cd8bc18dd6f9ead4@visp.net.lb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 2013-04-07 02:20, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Although hetzner.de claims that this whole loss is outside of their own network, I'm inclined to deduce that the loss might actually be concentrated on their own KPN / eurorings.net router -- kpn-gw.hetzner.de (134.222.107.21), and perhaps occurs only in one direction.
I think too. Btw as i said, have host on tinet, and it is 100% clear from EC2. So seems tinet is fine for sure. HOST: ip-10-203-61-X Snt Rcv Loss% Best Gmean Avg Wrst StDev 1.|-- ip-10-203-60-2.ec2.internal 60 60 0.0% 0.3 0.6 1.1 19.1 2.7 2.|-- ip-10-1-36-21.ec2.internal 60 60 0.0% 0.4 0.6 0.8 9.3 1.3 3.|-- ip-10-1-34-0.ec2.internal 60 60 0.0% 0.4 0.7 1.0 14.5 2.0 4.|-- 100.64.20.43 60 60 0.0% 0.4 0.6 0.6 2.0 0.2 5.|-- ??? 60 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.|-- ??? 60 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.|-- ??? 60 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.|-- 100.64.16.157 60 60 0.0% 0.5 2.4 9.7 68.8 16.1 9.|-- 72.21.222.154 60 60 0.0% 1.5 1.9 2.6 36.4 4.8 10.|-- 72.21.220.46 60 60 0.0% 1.5 2.1 3.3 59.2 7.6 11.|-- xe-7-2-0.was10.ip4.tinet.net 60 60 0.0% 1.6 2.1 2.6 17.2 3.1 12.|-- xe-0-1-0.fra23.ip4.tinet.net 60 60 0.0% 92.2 92.8 92.8 104.3 1.9 13.|-- ge-1-1-0.pr1.g310.fra.de.eurotransit.net 60 60 0.0% 92.2 93.1 93.2 112.8 3.3 14.|-- ??? 60 0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 last hop icmp blocked, it is my host
Although there is no traffic loss from he.net if you try to traceroute the router itself (I'm not sure what that means, though, other than a potential attack vector from exposing a router globally like that):
I don't think there is attack vector, proper control plane ACL will make them safe.
I've been a fan of hetzner.de, but I think it's staggering that they won't do anything about this huge and persistent packet loss. Indeed, i noticed that transfers from EC2 are terrible last days to Hetzner.
Maybe worth to open topic at www.webhostingtalk.com ?
Best regards, Constantine.
--- Denys Fedoryshchenko, Network Engineer, Virtual ISP S.A.L. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 18:24:10 -0700 From: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTMz-rpx8UOX7QNpqr8x3ESQEo34m+6EpNquumnzDLRdA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Interesting. http://www22.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/highspeedinternet/netw... ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 21:32:47 -0400 From: Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Message-ID: <5C944EFC-CD47-4569-9452-5133B5F780E9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Very interesting indeed. Way to do the right thing here Verizon. This may be the first time I've been happy to be a Comcast customer. -- Josh Smith kD8HRX email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com Phone: 304.237.9369(c) Sent from my iPad On Apr 6, 2013, at 9:24 PM, "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting.
http://www22.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/highspeedinternet/netw...
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 21:41:43 -0400 From: Oliver Garraux <oliver@g.garraux.net> To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Message-ID: <CAD_uLpO5CyGCrOUdk5WRbYRnMUf4K9PFeWi6ZSWmzwJDTxTBhA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Good to see that they are providing a way for users to opt out. I'm hoping that other ISP's will do the same when they implement CGN. Oliver ------------------------------------- Oliver Garraux Check out my blog: blog.garraux.net Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Joshua Smith <juicewvu@gmail.com> wrote:
Very interesting indeed. Way to do the right thing here Verizon. This may be the first time I've been happy to be a Comcast customer.
-- Josh Smith kD8HRX
email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com Phone: 304.237.9369(c)
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 6, 2013, at 9:24 PM, "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting.
http://www22.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/highspeedinternet/netw...
------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:43:34 -0500 From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: ICMP Redirect on Resolvers Message-ID: <CAAAwwbWNvMsPb_h-cfxDWYUSC2i1_3pFfJfK7Kx_cN3ajBnn5Q@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 4/6/13, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
On Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:38:06 -0400, shawn wilson said:
case, you shouldn't see any valid ICMP redirects. They're there mostly so
things kind-of-sort-of work even if you botch it (so for instance, even if you whiff your default route accidentally, you can still ssh in from Tokyo and fix > it).
For ICMP redirects to do anything useful, a valid route has to actually be there already, on the default gateway.... Perhaps you are thinking of proxy arp? :) -- -JH ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 21:42:00 -0400 From: Derek Ivey <derek@derekivey.com> To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Message-ID: <5160CEE8.6010404@derekivey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" It would be nice to get an update from them regarding their IPv6 plans. Their IPv6 support page still says they will start deploying "3Q12" :(. On 4/6/2013 9:32 PM, Joshua Smith wrote:
Very interesting indeed. Way to do the right thing here Verizon. This may be the first time I've been happy to be a Comcast customer.
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4249 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130406/03a6630f/attachment-0001.bin> ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 19:11:14 -0700 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com> To: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN Message-ID: <CAPKkNb5QLynunmMkcLusMgDHGb9C1RhH0Hv+YWt+SigvWdowtA@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 6 April 2013 18:24, cb.list6 <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting.
http://www22.verizon.com/support/residential/internet/highspeedinternet/netw...
<blockquote>
What is CGN - and How to opt-out The number and types of devices using the Internet have increased dramatically in recent years and, as a result, address space for these devices is being rapidly exhausted. Today?s technology for IP addresses is referred to as IPv4 (Internet Protocol version 4). The IP addresses aligned with IPv4 are expected to be depleted at some point in the near future. The next generation of IP address space is IPv6, which will enable far more addresses to be assigned than IPv4. Unfortunately, most servers and other Internet devices will not be speaking IPv6 for a while, so IPv4 will remain standard for some time to come.
During this transitional period, in select areas for High Speed Internet residential customers, Verizon will be implementing Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGN or Carrier Grade NAT). Verizon FiOS and Verizon Business customers are not impacted at this time by the change. This transition will enable Verizon to continue serving customers with IPv4 internet addresses. CGN will not impact the access, reliability, speed, or security of Verizon?s broadband services. However, there are some applications such as online gaming, VPN access, FTP service, surveillance cameras, etc., that may not work when broadband service is provided via a CGN.
For our customers utilizing these types of applications, Verizon provides the ability to "opt out ?of CGN. To "opt out" you must:
Be a Residential customer with High Speed Internet Service. There is no need to ?opt-out? if you are a FiOS or Business customer. Have already been transitioned to the Carrier Grade Network by Verizon. If you are a Residential High Speed Internet customer and are unable to opt-out, it is likely that you have not yet been transitioned to CGN.
To "opt out" of CGN sign onto your My Verizon account and select "Opt out of Carrier Grade Network".
</blockquote> I like how, according to the document, Verizon must first break your connectivity, prior to you being able to opt-out. :-) Also:
select "Opt out of Carrier Grade Network"
Smart wording. :-) Frankly, I'm surprised to see this news. I thought Verizon had better things to do that plan any kind of upgrades or changes to something that everyone thought they consider dead anyways. C. End of NANOG Digest, Vol 63, Issue 29 *************************************