9 Sep
2020
9 Sep
'20
4:11 a.m.
On 9/Sep/20 10:03, Jeff Tantsura via NANOG wrote:
De-facto standards are as good as people implementing them, however in order to enforce non ambiguous implementations, it has to be de-jure (e.g. a standard track RFC). While I’m sympathetic to the idea, I’m quite skeptical about its viability. A well written BCP would be much more valuable, and perhaps when we get to a critical mass, codification would be a natural process, rather than artificially enforcing people doing stuff they don’t see value (ROI) in, discussion here perfectly reflects the state of art.
This. Mark.