17 May
2024
17 May
'24
5:13 a.m.
On 17/05/2024 5:45, Karl Auer wrote:
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 19:27 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 5/16/24 7:22 PM, Scott Q. wrote:
Mike, you do realize Google/Gmail rejects e-mails with invalid/missing SPF right ? I was receiving the mail while NANOG had no SPF record, so no? Any receiver would be really stupid take a single signal as disqualifying. For small-scale senders, it's either or both. For large-scale senders (5000+ per day) it's both.
At least according to this:
I think some may have missed these announcements: https://labs.ripe.net/author/fergalc/enhancing-email-delivery-at-the-ripe-nc... https://blog.google/products/gmail/gmail-security-authentication-spam-protec... Regards, Hank