20 Jan
2005
20 Jan
'05
6:55 p.m.
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if they continued not to allow transfers for .com.
See:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html
The original judgment is at:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought capital... at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time though auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...