21 Dec
2005
21 Dec
'05
8:30 p.m.
I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea? Andrew Kirch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:
I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog