Wouldn't it be better to ask the folks in Hungary (AS20922) who are peering with this site? One side, I'd buy the typo. Both sides, mutual typos are a little more difficult. Not that conspiracy theories are all that much fun, but I'm finding the one-sided mistake hard to believe. Either that or the folks at AS20922 haven't figured out that an open bgp peer isn't a great idea! :) Scott -----Original Message----- From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:36 PM To: Marshall Eubanks Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: AS 54271 those prefixes all have ripe route object with origin AS 20922 all the routes I see for a given prefix look like the following: 2914 1299 12301 8696 20922 54271 129.250.0.171 from 129.250.0.171 (129.250.0.12) Origin IGP, metric 1, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 2914:420 2914:2000 2914:3000 65504:1299 2497 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271 202.232.0.2 from 202.232.0.2 (202.232.0.2) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external 7660 2516 3257 12301 8696 20922 54271 203.181.248.168 from 203.181.248.168 (203.181.248.168) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external Community: 2516:1030 etc... Marshall Eubanks wrote:
As of this morning, I am seeing BGP from AS 54271
*> 62.77.196.0/22 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 62.77.254.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 81.17.184.0/22 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 81.17.190.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 82.131.196.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 82.131.198.0/24 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 82.131.248.0/21 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.64.0/22 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.70.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.72.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.78.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.82.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.96.0/23 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i *> 89.148.99.0/24 38.101.161.116 6991 0 174 3549 3549 3549 12301 8696 20922 54271 i
This ASN has not been assigned to any RIR. Is this a bogon, or does anyone know of a legitimate reason for this ?
Regards Marshall