Wait! Are you suggesting to not use it as intended by RFC6598? "to be used as Shared Address Space to accommodate the needs of Carrier- Grade NAT (CGN) devices. It is anticipated that Service Providers will use this Shared Address Space to number the interfaces that connect CGN devices to Customer Premises Equipment (CPE)" :) .as On 18/10/2012 13:25, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Majdi S. Abbas <msa@latt.net> wrote:
RFCs are just paper. As for why they use it.. the common private use reserved blocks (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) are all in use internally in their customers networks. This is probably the easiest way to avoid addressing conflicts.
but, but, but!! we have that nifty new '1918' space... 100.64.0.0/10
:)