On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
You propose stateless NAT64 as an viable alternative to CGN.
where do i do that?
Nick Hilliard: "don't believe for a moment that v6 to v4 protocol translation is any less ugly than CGN." Your reply (verbosity added for clarity): "[Sure it is! Unlike where folks solve their problem with CGN, v6 to v4 protocol translation] can be stateless."
The question stands: where are you planning to get the extra IPv4 addresses for the static 1:1 mapping?
maybe look at the +P in A+P
Nah, I'm done following bread crumbs for the day. Explain yourself or don't. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004