The only thing that sounds worse would
be to give them address space and tell them to NAT the traffic based on
the path it takes.
Keegan Holley
Network Engineer, Network Managed Services
SunGard Availability Services
Mezzanine Level MC-95
401 N. Broad St.
Philadelphia, PA 19108
215.446.1242 (office)
609.670.2149 (cell)
Keegan.Holley@sungard.com
___________________________________________
Keeping People and Information Connected®
http://www.availability.sungard.com
"Wayne E. Bouchard"
<web@typo.org>
10/08/2007 05:53 PM
To
Keegan.Holley@sungard.com
cc
nanog <nanog@merit.edu>, owner-nanog@merit.edu
Subject
Re: How Not to Multihome
Slightly different approach... Needing to multihome
is justification
for requesting an ASN. Is this strictly necessary? No. You can source
the block on his behalf but that creates various routing
inconsistancies. There are other even more unpleasant ways of doing
this that are perfectly feasible. (I'd be willing to use them if I was
the client since I know what I'm doing but I would not be willing to
have a client of mine use them because it would scare the hell out of
me.)
-Wayne
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:43:03PM -0400, Keegan.Holley@sungard.com wrote:
> I have a client that wants us to advertise an IP block assigned by
another
> ISP. I know that the best practice is to have them request an
AS number
> from ARIN and peer with us, etc. However, I cannot find any
information
> that states as law. Does anyone know of a document or RFC that
states
> this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keegan
---
Wayne Bouchard
web@typo.org
Network Dude
http://www.typo.org/~web/