5 Oct
2017
5 Oct
'17
10:53 a.m.
https://superuser.com/questions/784978/why-did-the-ietf-specifically-choose-... On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra@baylink.com> wrote:
Does anyone have a pointer to an *authoritative* source on why
10/8 172.16/12 and 192.168/16
were the ranges chosen to enshrine in the RFC? Came up elsewhere, and I can't find a good citation either.
To list or I'll summarize.
Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274