Helllo Pui, Thanks for the pointers but I think you misunderstood my question. I know how to set up a captive portal for WiFi access. What I wanted to know is how are users logging into captive portals when the browser has a proxy set and it tries to send all requests to the proxy server which until they authenticate to the captive portal they cannot reach ? Eugeniu On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Pui Edylie <email@edylie.net> wrote:
Hi Eugeniu,
You could use the inexpensive Mikrotik User Manager
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Manager/Introduction
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:User_Manager
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/User_Manager/Getting_started
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blEGv5i-aO4
Good Luck :)
Edy
On 12/6/2013 3:14 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
Hi,
How do you handle captive portals in hotels and other venues where you first have to login into the portal and then have Internet access ?
This is my biggest woe right now in this regards with any kind of proxy settings I can push to users.
Thanks, Eugeniu
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip@gmail.com> wrote:
We currently use CCWS (previously ScanSafe) with the Anyconnect client.
Nice solution. Whether your in the office or remoting from a Starbucks, the traffic is always proxied. We went with the solution because of a couple reasons:
1. with multiple egress points on the corporate network, we didn't want to be down if we lost a proxy server.
2. corporate laptops whether in the office or at Starbucks would still be proxied. This helps limit our virus and malware infections. and provides HR reports.
3 split tunneling would be an option because the traffic doesn't have to come back to your internal proxy.
4. our remote home office bandwidth is very limited, so using the cloud it provided for better use of that bandwidth.
all and all it's a good solution. I'm not going to tell you that we have not had any issues, but with any new solution, there will be a couple bruises along the way.
YMMV
Scott
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Herro91 <herro91@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing some research on the Cisco Cloud Web Security offering, also known as ScanSafe.
Has anyone on the lists explored Cisco's ScanSafe SaaS offering, now
called
Cisco Cloud Web Security - as a means of providing protection in the
cloud
that would potentially negate the requirement to have a full tunnel (i.e. allow split tunneling) for teleworkers?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/