On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Paul Ferguson wrote:
I personally don't object, per se, but I dropped off the inet-access list earlier this year due to the unbearably low signal/noise ratio. If the NANOG list were to become a cacophony as did inet-access, you can scratch this list too.
I figure that if anyone on inet-access is interested in the discussion(s) here on NANOG, then they are already subscribed.
Let me guess: Last spring during the CDA rants with Karl going full bore? Yup, I logged off it too for a while. It's better now, few messages, more signal. But the s/n is still a fraction of nanog:( Still, as someone on the steep side of the learning curve I'd love to have hyper-access to the things this list has covered. --- David ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do!