On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Martin Taylor wrote:
wouldn't this question be better served at:
comp.dcom.sys.cisco
it doesn't seem to fit the NANOG charter.
marty --- Jeff Wheat <jeff@cetlink.net> wrote:
We have an almost identical problem. I have a 3640 connected to a catalyst 2924XL. I have the switch and router both locked at 100/fdx. The crc error
Sir "too im-PO-tant to read about switch<->router issues" 'm'arty: Somehow, I find the content in the thread you are complaining about to be MUCH more operational than bitching about the damned charter, debating the merits of gender specific mailing lists, information hot-air balloon rides, the HASL in NM, etc. In three words -- GET A LIFE. If you can't afford a life, perhaps sending an unsubscribe request would be a good alternative. Your lack of capitolization and the email address fit right in with the image you have projected. 'nuff said. --- John Fraizer