4 Jan
2016
4 Jan
'16
4:19 a.m.
On 1/Jan/16 17:19, Nick Hilliard wrote:
If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the plague. Unless there are overriding technical reasons why it wouldn't work, l3vpn will almost always provide a far better quality service.
Almost every time a customer has asked me for VPLS (or EVPN), they've been just fine with l3vpn as a suggested alternative. Other customers are all about doing their own routing... Mark.