6 Mar
2014
6 Mar
'14
7:19 p.m.
Saku Ytti wrote:
It's essentially abusing (some what well-defined and interoperable abuse) 32b tag field for this purpose.
That's pretty much what the OSPF tag and the BGP's synchronisation with OSPF were originally intended for. However it's pretty much a design misfeature and you'd be happier with iBGP over a tunnel -glen