10 Apr
2001
10 Apr
'01
1:30 p.m.
From: Patrick Evans [mailto:pre@pre.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 10:22 AM
On the flipside, who is actually less concerned about routing table size? The multihomed networks on the edges who can use a default if they want to, and are likely to be carrying less traffic and so have more resources to deal with routing, or the core networks who have capacity problems of their own?
AFAICT, multi-homing doesn't work unless you also have dynamic routing. Is this wrong?