Re: IAB and "private" numbering

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005, Mark Smith wrote:

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:12:13 +0000 (GMT) "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com> wrote:

<snip>

...

I don't believe there is a 'rfc1918' in v6 (yet), I agree that it doesn't seem relevant, damaging perhaps though :)

Sort of do, with a random component in them to help attempt to prevent collisions :

"RFC 4193 - Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses" http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4193.html

and here I thought we voted that down in atleast ARIN space :( bummer, more failure coming your way as you sit and wait :(