Well, None beside they're advertising a fake route of part of a MIT subnet using ASNs I care about. (Which include GTT and MIT) Right now their getting it from their outfit in JP which do not have a LG, and we cannot find any other crumbs in most LG found on lookingglass.org. Without any cooperation from the only place we can see it, there isn't much we can do. PS; Might be a generational gap, but in the olden days we used to be able to get cooperation from other operators. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 05/31/18 09:58, Phil Lavin wrote:
What is the relationship of 103.97.52.2 (Colocation Australia - Japan) to you? Is this, for example, a peering over an IX? If so, did you learn the route from route servers or do you peer directly with them?
Phil
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: 31 May 2018 14:50 To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: BGP Hijack/Sickness with AS4637
Hi,
Well bad news on the ColoAU front, they refused to cooperate.
We'll pushback thru our GTT accounts... But I'm running out of ideas.
If anyone has any good ideas how to proceed at this point feel free to share =D.
----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
On 05/29/18 16:31, Chris Conn wrote:
Hello,
I am the contact for AS16532.
We never announced nor are we currently advertising this prefix as we are not a transit AS for anyone. As well, it seems to appear and disappear from AS63956 looking glass. According to that LG, the route changed 6d ago, and is *still currently visible* at this very moment;
Command: show route 18.29.238.0 protocol bgp table vrf-international.inet.0 active-path
vrf-international.inet.0: 696764 destinations, 2288960 routes (696480 active, 0 holddown, 103994 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
18.29.238.0/23 *[BGP/170] 6d 01:06:11, localpref 90, from 103.97.52.2 AS path: 4637 3257 29909 16532 16532 16532 16532 I, validation-state: unverified
AS16532 is not announcing this prefix. We have a strict prefix-list that is applied to all sessions. As well, AS29909 is filtering us using our announced AS-SETS/RPSL to avoid us the ability to do anything dumb. And lastly, our announcements are being filtered by AS3257 as we are required to provide them via LOA.
There is still something wrong somewhere that is injecting this path, anyone have a LG pointed to AS4637 seeing this prefix announced with AS16532 in the AS path?
I doubt that AS29909 bouncing its BGP session with AS3257 (GTT) would change anything, as I am not seeing this prefix in their route-server
public@route-server.as3257.net-re0> show route 18.29.238.0 protocol bgp active-path
inet.0: 691667 destinations, 11752983 routes (691665 active, 1 holddown, 1 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
18.29.0.0/16 *[BGP/170] 3w4d 11:42:33, MED 0, localpref 100, from 213.200.87.23 AS path: 3257 174 3 I, validation-state: unverified > to 141.136.111.13 via xe-1/0/0.0
{master} public@route-server.as3257.net-re0>
{master} public@route-server.as3257.net-re0> show route 18.29.238.0 protocol bgp | find 16532
Pattern not found {master}
So whatever is happening, its not at AS16532, AS29909 nor AS3257 that I can find.
Chris Conn AS16532
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Tom Paseka via NANOG Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 6:01 PM To: Nikolas Geyer <nik@neko.id.au> Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: BGP Hijack/Sickness with AS4637
This looks like a route that has been cached by some ISPs/routers even though a withdrawal has actually happened.
If you actually forward packets a long the path, you'll see its not following the AS Path suggested, instead the real route that it should be. Bouncing your session with 4637 would likely clear this.
-Tom
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Nikolas Geyer <nik@neko.id.au> wrote:
Greetings!
Actually, what you have provided below shows the exact opposite. It shows ColoAU have received the route from 4637 who have received it from 3257 who have received it from 29909 who have received it from 16532 who originated it. It infers nothing about who 16532 found the route to come from.
It is evident that GTT are advertising that route to Telstra Global :)
Regards, Nik.
And I'm pretty sure AS3257 (GTT ) is in the same boat as us, as
they're not the one advertising those routes to AS4637
AS16532 found it to come from AS4637 as you can see from this ColoAU
LG output below
----- https://lg.coloau.com.au/
vrf-international.inet.0: 696533 destinations, 2248101 routes (696249 active, 0 holddown, 103835 hidden) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
18.29.238.0/23 *[BGP/170] 1d 19:57:28, localpref 90, from 103.97.52.2 AS path: 4637 3257 29909 16532 16532 16532 16532 I, validation-state: unverified -- ----- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443