7 Apr
2013
7 Apr
'13
6:42 a.m.
On Sun, 7 Apr 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I wonder how much more painful just upgrading the dsl plant to support v6 would be vs deploying the cgn equipment and funneling users through that :(
IPv6 deployment is not a short term solution to IPv4 address depletion. Would you be less upset if there was IPv6 access and CPE based DS Lite (ie your IPv4 is still CGN:ed, just in a different way)? CGN is here to stay for IPv4. The solution for long term Internet growth is IPv6. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se