It is certainly possible – thanks for the suggestion! If you’d like to participate, let me know 1:1 off list.
Jason
From:
NANOG <nanog-bounces+jason_livingood=cable.comcast.com@nanog.org> on behalf of Bryan Ward <Bryan.Ward@dartmouth.edu>
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2024 at 16:58
To: Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: RE: Attn Access ISPs - FCC BB Labels (machine-readable standards)
Why reinvent new 4-digit codes to identify the type of service? Can’t the existing ATIS service codes be used for this too?
--
Bryan Ward
Lead Network Engineer
Dartmouth College Network Services
bryan.ward@dartmouth.edu
Scheduling a meeting? I prefer Zoom.
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+bryan.ward=dartmouth.edu@nanog.org>
On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason via NANOG
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 9:08 AM
To: Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Attn Access ISPs - FCC BB Labels (machine-readable standards)
Yesterday the FCC broadband label order is in effect – so all ISPs need to publish them. Oct 10, 2024 is the deadline to produce machine-readable BB labels.
I have kicked off an effort via the BITAG to standardize the format of these labels.
See https://github.com/jlivingood/Broadband-Labels for
some initial ideas.
If you’d like to participate – because you are an ISP publishing labels or
an org/researcher that will be importing/consuming/comparing labels –
you may wish to participate. There’s no fee or docs to sign to do so, and your participation does noy convey endorsement of the final work product. IF INTERESTED – email me off-list and I will provide details.
Thanks!
Jason