Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=<pedrom@nexo.es> rejected RCPT <owner-radiusext@ops.ietf.org>: blocked because 118.39.80.118 is in blacklist at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org: Mail from 118.39.80.118 blocked using Trend Micro Email Reputation database. Please see <http://www.mail-abuse.com/cgi-bin/lookup?118.39.80.118> 2012-01-04 00:37:28 no host name found for IP address 118.39.80.118 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT 118.39.80.118 too many bad recip 2012-01-04 00:37:29 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org
7.8% is over ipv6 transport
but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6.
what do other folk see?
Main inbound MX for a large educational institution sees around 5% of mails coming in via IPv6. Might be a bit biased due to holiday season. Outbound is mostly running on legacy servers without IPv6, yet :-( Bernhard