On Sun, Nov 15, 1998 at 02:29:11PM -0600, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
simply set up INN out of the box, with cancels enabled, and never change the defaults. This means that when your cancels leak, and they will, administrators have to opt-out. Saying this is the fault of their peers is merely petty buck-passing; it's the fault of -YOUR- peers.)
This is why I don't support Karl's proposal. Not because it is a fundamentally bad idea or because I have a problem with him personally (the latter of which has been seen far too much), but because it fails to address the basic need for personal privacy in a public forum, and because it fails to operate as a strictly opt-out mechanism.
Ditto that. And really, it CAN'T operate strictly as an opt-out mechanism. While I'm sure Karl is quite competent enough to be able to configure a server and a newsfeed, he is only human, and mistakes *do* happen. -- Steve Sobol [sjsobol@nacs.net] Part-time Support Droid [support@nacs.net] NACS Spaminator [abuse@nacs.net] Spotted on a bumper sticker: "Possum. The other white meat."