26 Jun
2001
26 Jun
'01
1:43 p.m.
Following up on my own post: vixie@mfnx.net (Paul Vixie) writes:
Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like: ...
Several folks here talked about technical implementation aspects (RPF, etc) and a few told me privately that peering was a sales/marketing activity at this stage of the game. This either means that upgrading the general level of peering agreement is not possible, or that the people I should be discussing it with don't read NANOG. This echos what I learnt at Stephen's BOF in Phoenix.