30 Nov
2012
30 Nov
'12
4:48 p.m.
On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:08 AM, Henning Brauer <hb-nanog@bsws.de> wrote:
and re IANA, they made it clear they would not give us a proto number
As they should have. IANA abides by the rules laid down for it by the IETF/IESG/IAB. The openbsd folks couldn't be bothered to even write up a draft and chose to squat on a protocol number.
no matter what;
BS. If the openbsd folks followed the rules, they'd have gotten the number(s) they requested (assuming they were justified). There is no grand persecution here. There is management of a limited resource.
we didn't have a choice but to ignore that industry-money-driven committee.
Which 'industry-money-driven committee' would that be? Regards, -drc