Thanks guys. That was an informative read. I will do some more troubleshooting. Derek On Sep 26, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Blake Dunlap <ikiris@gmail.com> wrote:
This is not the proper way to interpret traceroute information. Also, 3 pings is not sufficient to determine levels of packet loss statistically.
I suggest searching the archives regarding traceroute, or googling how to interpret them in regards to packet loss, as what you posted does not indicate what you think it does.
Agreed. Derek should read "A Practical Guide to (Correctly) Troubleshooting with Traceroute": http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N4...
-- Darius Jahandarie